Tribute to our Heroes
Untitled
A comedy show is proving that intelligence outweighs hardwork !
Doubts !
Inevitable has come to pass !
Financial crisis taking dangerous turns !
followup on previous post.
lik suppos thr r 100 molecules n 1ml of water..cn tat 100 molecule b sequnced...1-100
Shortcut phobia and useless words !
statistics
Thank you Xerox, IBM, SUN !
Inspiring!
Dear Fellow IITians:
A good morning to you and how are you all?
I see that you are all having a wonderful time. Isn’t Shilpa Shetty quite a bomb? I tell you, the stuff of dreams. Aren’t we just great? We must be. Otherwise why would such a stellar personality — a phoren star — come to strut her stuff here? Aside from the money we paid her, of course.
Not just good looking people, we are so important that India’s only living Nobel Laureate, Prof Amartya Sen, has changed his schedule just to fly in and deliver his usual spiel about inclusive growth. Wow! We’re the best. The cat’s whiskers, the loin’s (sic) roar, the cheery on top of the sundae, the crème de la crème. Isn’t that precious!
But I got some bad news for you, sunshine. We have all fed at the trough of public largesse. We’ve sucked at the teat of involuntary public generosity. We, the select, the few — our fancy education was funded by denying a very large number of the really poor the opportunity to even get a basic education.
So my precious sweeties, don’t you think that it is time that you actually paid the full cost of your education now that you can? Should we not today, now, here, at this very convention — and a very nice convention it is — decide that every one of the fortunate 300,000 should contribute at least the full amount spent on us for a fund which will do for others what was done for us?
Let me make the promise of paying Rs 20 lakhs today into this fund — the IIT Graduates’ Gift of Gratitude Fund (IITGGGF) — to be used for the future generations of IITians. I don’t have that cash lying around in my checking account but I am sure that I can get a bank loan today and pay back that amount I owe.
In other words, put up or shut up, my preciouses.
Thanks and may you all have a wonderful time congratulating each other on how wonderful you all are.
Intelligence vs Hard work
Sarcastic Humor
Vantage Point
Epsilon theory.
Epsilon (uppercase Ε, lowercase ε; Greek: Έψιλον) is the fifth letter of the Greek alphabet, corresponding phonetically to a close-mid front unrounded vowel /e/. In the system of Greek numerals it has a value of 5. It was derived from the Phoenician letter He . Letters that arose from Epsilon include the Roman E and Cyrillic Ye.
Here is the most important use of ε to remember. This notation from mathematics forms the basis for our postulate
In mathematics (particularly calculus), an arbitrarily (or nearly so) small positive quantity is commonly denoted ε;
Postulate.
If X is the amount of love you are going to have after marriage then affair before marriage is like an ε. Affair adds an ε amount of extra love in your life. In some cases people have tendency to add multiple epsilons in their life.
There are two obvious but completely different corollaries proposed by different set of people on this postulate.
corollary: 1
In India, Its not worth to waste your time on ε unless its not free because by construction of the society in India, everyone is guaranteed to have X unlike some countries where ε is a must to achieve X.
corollary: 2
Even though ε is negligible in comparison to X but ε has some distinguished properties which makes it desirable to posses at least 1*ε for whatever cost it demands. This distinguished property is difficult to explain in words.
These two contradictory corollaries from the same postulate makes this theory controversial and its still matter of much study and research amongst social scientists. Up to the writing of this post validity of none of the corollaries has been proved and none have been contradicted with certainty.
The theory presented here will form the basis of many upcoming posts like marriage, love marriage, arrange marriage, premarital affairs, post marital affairs etc. these posts will assume validity of any one of the corollaries depending upon the state of mind and experience gained at the time of writing post.
Note: Both the corollaries and postulate are open for further refinement.
Also many people tend to assume both the corollaries as independent lemmas depending upon the experience they have.
The amount of confusion and broad nature of these corollaries makes this theory very popular research topic specially for younger people.
Big vs Small
Confusion !
So here it goes, whenever I try to analyze myself and the system in which I am living, I get confused, I feel like,what the hell is happening with me, what kind of person I am. What type of society I am living in. I don't have a clear cut idea of almost anything. I am confused, and here is the gist for few of my confusions.
confusion#1 "God, religion and all"
I don't know whether I am an atheist, theist or Agnostic, but it seems my thoughts puts me closest to a definition of agnostic. Religion is something which I think a lot about and at the end of day I become more confused. Why do people believe in God? My perception is that because people don't want to take a chance, they want to be on safer side, if by chance GOD exists then he may punish him/her for denying the existence of almighty. Nobody wants to take risk by
annoying omnipotent, almighty God. But you said he is always helpful, always does good. He is interested in welfare of humanity, life and nature in any form. Oh cm on! even if GOD exists, then by your own definition, he is not going to punish you, so be bold and don't follow something just for the heck that everybody else is saying its there, if you have sufficient proof to believe, then alright, best of luck, don't bother me. I will find myself as you found it and don't force your experiences on me. I don't see any reason to believe that you are more capable than me in finding out this truth.Yes, because the background is different. The background is the only thing that can express itself. What else is there? My expression of it is the background: how I struggled, my path, the path I followed, how I rejected the paths of others -- up to that point I can say what I did or what I did not do -- so, that did not help me in any way. one of the most popular reasons why people believe in GOD is because they are damn sure that they have got many favors from GOD which reinforces there belief that God exists. Absurd, totally absurd, do you know,if some event has probability 0 of its occurrence then it doesn't mean it may never occur, it can, but I am sure it also doesn't infer that GOD exist.It looks I have more inclination towards not believing in GOD but I don't have enough reasons and proof for it. To be on safer side (its natural human tendency) I currently pretend myself to be an Agnostic, If God exists then, Oh almighty! please ignore my ignorance, I never said you don't exist, and if God doesn't exist then its cool I dint do anything to satisfy God, my precious time was not wasted in doing it.Voila!! I am confused but on safer side. Maximizing gains is aim of all the businesses we do and I am simply doing that.
confusion#2 "How to behave or live in society"
Broadly speaking there are three school of thoughts on "how to behave or live in society". First one says, do whatever your heart says, never think about right or wrong, self love is the only love. you got it! I am talking about objectivism, the philosophy made popular by Ayn Rand. I have two doubts abouts this philosophy, first of all it is impractical and difficult to practice unless you are a sage and living in Himalayas. If one claims to be normal person, living in a social system and also claims that he follows objectivism then at best he may be called a hypocrite, and according to me, he is making a wasteful, infertile attempt to gain liberation by fooling himself. Also one of the downsides of objectivism is that it will make society too boring and mechanical. That's not how we want world to be. Imagine a situation in which everybody loves himself and do whatever he wants. Is this interesting to you? Not to me. How boring !
The basic principle of objectivism lies in objective reality. generally objectivists don't believe in God or supernatural. they authorize themselves the prophet of reason, truth and reality. Alright. that sounds cool and I will make you happy by saying that you belong to a cult and I will also accept that it endorses my current state of confusion and satisfies me by saying that you are not thinking something too odd. Then the question comes, why don't I label myself as a objectivist? here is the answer from the church of reality.
"Unfortunately however, much of objective philosophy extends beyond the concept of objective reality (feature creep), and under the banner of Objectivism Ayn Rand extols the virtues of being selfish, greedy, and all but worships capitalism. At the same time, Altruism is described as "evil", as culture Objectivists look down their noses at generosity, giving, sharing, selflessness, and community concepts. Objectivists claim to be rugged individualists and advocates of
individual freedom. I also support individuality and individual freedoms, however I don't see community as the opposite of individuality. Objectivists are not entirely monolithic in their beliefs. One Objectivist named David Kelly wrote an article titled Generosity and Self-Interest where he acknowledges that "dichotomy between self-interest and generosity is a false one." However, Objectivism has been called an Unlikely cult because the Ayn Rand
followers have adopted her personality quirks which includes extreme arrogance. I would hope that we learn from this".
second school of thought says, "think good, be good, do good". I don't have enough time to think what is good so please go to hell or heaven but don't trouble me or yourself by telling what is good.
There is third school of thought which says live life as it is, don't think too much about it, enjoy every moment of it. what a crap! I am a thinking human being and God(if it does exist!) has given me some brain so please don't tell me that I can follow this path. Its out of scene.I may be insane but I claim to have my mind. I don't endorse objectivism, totally disapprove "think good, do good, be good" policy and I am not lame enough to accept "don't think" attitude. It looks like I am ineligible to join any of the schools, I am confused, what will happen to my career without a degree :(
Confusion#3 "Capitalism vs Socialism"
Although in its pure form, both capitalism and socialism endorses philanthropy and altruism and both are based on the basic principle to make a happy social system. No matter how much one blames other but in my opinion both of them are good in their ideal form. But in practicality there are large differences between the two.Practical capitalism does good job when there is good regulatory mechanism to check its misuse by certain individuals or organisation with vested interest and exploiting the herd mentality.But its too big an assumptions and I don't think currently we have enough capability to device such mechanism. So called "Land of opportunity" I am not happy to see you as a model of capitalist state, you are the biggest exploiter of the world and its resources. Also you are the most selfish and destructive model one can think of. Stop being snob and looking down at other less privileged one. Unfortunately everyone sees you a model to emulate which is not so good. you are presenting a bad example to follow.
I have no doubt in my mind that Socialism as a concept looks attractive but I have a firm belief that in its pure form its not implementable and its implementable version is too far from the concept that it becomes more exploiting and bad than capitalism. None of the concept is capable of making a happy social system. Its better to find a balance between the both. I don't see this happening anywhere in the world so I am confused that if someone wants to make the world happier place! Everyone has their rigid thoughts and they are following the books which they liked most, even if the principles in that book is not helpful or capable of achieving something good. Thank you! Marx, Engels. I am convinced that your ideas were good but I am also convinced that they are of no practical use.
This is the topic which can be really long so I am ending it here without raising too many questions about both the systems.
lets have fun and enjoy confusion !